precise claim造句
例句与造句
- :The users have to present precise claims.
- He said it typically takes creditors 100 days to file precise claims in bankruptcy court.
- Following this the question of exactly what the B醔's precise claim was, was raised.
- If you wish to make specific claims in articles, find sources making those precise claims, and seek consensus on the appropriate article talk pages for inclusion of such claims.
- :: This People Magazine article from 2003 gives the rather precise claim that US $ 238.7 million of her US $ 445.5 million came from book sales.
- It's difficult to find precise claim in a sentence. 用precise claim造句挺难的
- One would need a specific RS for the precise claim for it to be in any BLP at all, and the matter of political spectrum analysis is irrelevant here . talk ) 17 : 28, 18 December 2010 ( UTC)
- So Bertrand's postulate is comparatively weaker than the PNT . But PNT is a deep theorem, while Bertrand's Postulate can be stated more memorably and proved more easily, and also makes precise claims about what happens for small values of " n " . ( In addition, Chebyshev's theorem was proved before the PNT and so has historical interest .)
- :: : To people who consider anything beyond parroting what's been said in some source to be " original research " and therefore unreliable-to those who think that's the WP Law ( no, it isn't, taking it like that is just a slogan ) an interview or an abstract becomes irrefutable, no matter how overstated things the researcher might say in it, as long as it is not shown that this source is somehow non-notable or that someone has taken the trouble to refute those precise claims, in that form.
- According to John Beversluis, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Butler University, for example, Talbott's view is " so outrageous . . . that I will not dignify it with a reply . . . . If Talbott is right, he is logically committed and morally obliged to oppose everyone dedicated to alleviating world hunger, ridding the world of terrorism, finding a cure for cancer . . . and so forth . " But in an equally hard-hitting reply, Talbott dismisses this claim by comparing it to a more precise claim of the following form : " If Talbott is right in accepting [ proposition ] " p " ( where " p " is specifically identified ), then Talbott is logically committed to " q " . " He then points out that a cogent argument in the present context would require two things of Beversluis : " first, that he identify a relevant instance of " p ", and second, that he make some attempt to deduce " q " from " p ".