precise claim造句

例句与造句

1. :The users have to present precise claims.
2. He said it typically takes creditors 100 days to file precise claims in bankruptcy court.
3. Following this the question of exactly what the B醔's precise claim was, was raised.
4. If you wish to make specific claims in articles, find sources making those precise claims, and seek consensus on the appropriate article talk pages for inclusion of such claims.
5. :: This People Magazine article from 2003 gives the rather precise claim that US $ 238.7 million of her US $ 445.5 million came from book sales.
6. It's difficult to find precise claim in a sentence. 用precise claim造句挺难的
7. One would need a specific RS for the precise claim for it to be in any BLP at all, and the matter of political spectrum analysis is irrelevant here . talk ) 17 : 28, 18 December 2010 ( UTC)
8. So Bertrand's postulate is comparatively weaker than the PNT . But PNT is a deep theorem, while Bertrand's Postulate can be stated more memorably and proved more easily, and also makes precise claims about what happens for small values of " n " . ( In addition, Chebyshev's theorem was proved before the PNT and so has historical interest .)
9. :: : To people who consider anything beyond parroting what's been said in some source to be " original research " and therefore unreliable-to those who think that's the WP Law ( no, it isn't, taking it like that is just a slogan ) an interview or an abstract becomes irrefutable, no matter how overstated things the researcher might say in it, as long as it is not shown that this source is somehow non-notable or that someone has taken the trouble to refute those precise claims, in that form.
10. According to John Beversluis, Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at Butler University, for example, Talbott's view is " so outrageous . . . that I will not dignify it with a reply . . . . If Talbott is right, he is logically committed and morally obliged to oppose everyone dedicated to alleviating world hunger, ridding the world of terrorism, finding a cure for cancer . . . and so forth . " But in an equally hard-hitting reply, Talbott dismisses this claim by comparing it to a more precise claim of the following form : " If Talbott is right in accepting [ proposition ] " p " ( where " p " is specifically identified ), then Talbott is logically committed to " q " . " He then points out that a cogent argument in the present context would require two things of Beversluis : " first, that he identify a relevant instance of " p ", and second, that he make some attempt to deduce " q " from " p ".